Regardless of medium or era, education has always been the act of offering  information for acquisition. “Learning” is the individual  process, where one internalizes new concepts or skills. “Education,”  though, is the active delivery – the technique of shaping and  structuring ideas by an instructor so they are assumed readily and  permanently by a student.
The two most obvious changes in educational delivery over the past 15  years have been the visual representation and immediacy of  information.
Communication has advanced along an accelerating continuum from the  town crier to the printing press to the telephone, radio, television,  and Internet. The change in fact-finding, however, is different from  simple communication.
Information  channeling today is other-dimensional compared to the patterned practice  of 20 years ago. In 1990, when a student needed to write a report on  penguins or General Motors, he or she was dutifully dropped off at the  library by a parent and picked up eight hours later with a folder of  Xeroxes and microfiche printouts. Today the rapid and overwhelming  access to information leads to a host of questions regarding accuracy,  propriety, and property. Also, these facts and opinions are  typically encountered on the visual screen.
Howard Gardner’s learning  styles seem somewhat quaint today now that every child is a visual  learner. An updated system should be called “Visual+”, meaning “visual”  and then some other intelligence. From infancy, kids are babysat by  televisions. They absorb fairy tales from picture books and point to  themselves in their own digital photographs. As teachers, we, too, rely  on the immediate, pictorial nature of facts when we need to find a quick  historical photograph in 
Wikimedia or search directions on 
Google Maps  or snap a 
QR code with our smartphones.
We try to remember that if we as teachers aren't using something  anymore, it seems strange to make our students use it -- just because  "we did it when we were their age."