The announcement of 
Time magazine’s 
2011 “Person of the Year” as “The Protester” reminds us of the 2006 issue that declared “
You”  as its selection for the individual contributions made by user-generated information. Since 2006 a lot has changed in the world of  technology and information sharing. The floodgates have opened and  anyone, anytime, anywhere can share their ideas. There is no turning  back. The amount of content generated for the  World Wide Web by individuals now far exceeds the amount produced by  experts.
The advances in technology allow for form to be separated from  content. In other words, content no longer depends on finite  structures within the restrictions of code to create material on the  Internet. Instead, individuals create, share, and publish content with  incredible ease, allowing us to be the designers and distributors of our  own content. In Michael Wesch’s video produced in 2007, 
Web 2.0…The Machine is Us/ing Us, a line types across the screen that reads, “
The Web is linking people…Web 2.0 is linking people…people sharing, trading and collaborating.” For Wesch, media changed the way people interact with each other, and as a result, human relationships changed, too.
This year, the frustration felt by millions nationally and  internationally reached breaking points. The Tunisian fruit vendor who  set himself on fire had no idea that this would be the beginning of the  “Arab Spring,” toppling dictators in major countries in Africa. The  protestors who set out to show their frustration and anger in the 
Occupy Wall Street  movement hit a raw nerve in the American public, stemming protests  around the country that grew in size and number. So how does this relate  to education? Well, for one thing, we are heading into 2012, six years  past the recognition of “
You” by 
Time magazine, yet schools still try to block and restrict not only technologies, but teachers as well.
To top it off, we have a growing number of disgruntled youth in America who drop out of an education system that sees them as a number but  fails to see the ensuing impact on society as a whole. In hindsight, our  growing dropout rate as a nation should have been predictable.  Conformity and measurement are used to define students, yet we  constantly talk about differentiation, multiple learning styles, and the  whole child. The words "motivate" and "engage" appear in countless  educational books, articles and conference sessions. At the same time, the  daily press reports on holding teachers responsible for poor  standardized test results. It seems ironic: on routine assessments in  academic classes throughout the year, the student is accountable for his  or her success or failure, but not on standardized testing, where a  student’s poor performance is blamed on the teacher without regard to  class work. This leads us to ask the question, how many teachers will  “dropout” from conformity and measurement?
Just think how much more we could engage students if we were not so  close to the edge of a cliff. Teachers want change. Just follow the  streams of passionate teachers on social networking websites such as 
Twitter and 
Facebook.  Their frustration can be felt, including the pressure from virtual,  for-profit, and charter schools as the panaceas for educational  ills. Is there a bright spot at the end of the tunnel?
Well, there are  breaks in the ranks. States seek 
waivers to opt out of NCLB requirements, Long Island principals 
protest new New York State teacher evaluation based on test scores, and 
students nullify a standardized test  in defiance by writing essays about squirrels. Perhaps it's time  for educational leaders, teachers and students to be like the memorable  character 
Howard Beale in the 1976 movie 
Network and start shouting, 
"I'M MAD AS HELL AND AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE." 
Technology has altered the learning landscape, and the educational system  is reluctant to change with it. The youth of today do not live in a  static world. For them, at least outside the classroom, the world is dynamic,  interactive, animated, and collaborative. In fact, they know how to  collaborate better than the hierarchical systems imposed upon them.  Information in their world is fluid. In other words, content is free  from the constraints of structural limitations. Students recognize this.  Outside the classroom they are free from the restrictions of blocked  websites, filters, wired access, and standardized tests. They know there are multiple points  of view and access them with ease.
To them there is “
no shelf system”  for categorizing or telling them what they need. They generate content  at lightning speed, they publish continually on the web, and they design  how, when, and what they want to learn, follow or ignore. As educators,  we can learn a lot from our students and would do best to stand up for  designing content that is pertinent, rich, and connected. 
Something needed to give, and now it is.  
United Opt Out National  is a group of parents, educators, students and social activists who  are determined to bring about change to end standardized  testing that they see as destructive to ALL parties. In addition to protests by 
New York State principals, the organization 
Save Our Schools wants to put the public back in public schools and supports the 
Call for Action that 
United Opt Out National has declared on 
January 7, 2012. Let's also not forget the guest post that went viral from the 
Washington Post's The Answer Sheet about the school board member who took a standardized test and did not fare so well. Perhaps with the new year upon us, the groundswells of revolution will bring about education evolution after all.